Building Information Modeling as a Moderator Effects the Relationship Between Sustainability Metrics and Stakeholder Satisfaction

Hisham Noori Hussain Al-Hashimy

doi:10.51173/jt.v6i3.2593

Authors

Hisham Noori Hussain Al-Hashimy College of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Basrah, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51173/jt.v6i3.2593

Keywords:

Building Information Modeling, Water Management, Information Technologies Satisfaction, Those Helping Scale the Business

Abstract

The oil industry is, by virtue of being a resource of value addition, the engine of industrialisation in countries. When focusing on environmental concerns today, studying the connection between financial management and Building Information Modelling (BIM) in climate-friendly oil projects is highly recommended. This paper is dedicated to the role of sustainability and Iraq’s decisions in Accounting and Information Systems in Iraq’s oil sector. It aims to capture the relationship between everything that is based on sustainability metrics and economic actors who also play important roles in such undertakings. The research succeeded in collecting data by preparing a survey, which was conducted among leading oil companies in Iraq, with the aim of determining their information system procedures. The data was analysed using the methodology of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). The results illustrate the positive help for BIM by including sustainability metrics. The information system type for the BIM also significantly influences the relationship between sustainability indicators and public sectors, with public sector participants being the more determinant group. This means that financial metrics, which may be interpreted as a performance factor for BIM, play a role in creating links that serve as the predicates of the sustainability indicators. Additionally, it rBIMes the concept of trade-off on the operational aspects between sustainability and economic gains in oil trading by adding a unique perspective to existing literature. The model created in this study is grounded on the PLS-SEM, complemented by the literature, and the hypotheses are tested. Through the inclusive coverage of the oil industry, the information can enlighten and guide effective strategies for collaborating with architectural work stakeholders that highlight the importance of oil sector proposals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hisham Noori Hussain Al-Hashimy, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Basrah, Iraq

References

P. K. Painuly, R. Tyagi, S. Vishwakarma, S. K. Khare, and M. Haghighi, “Energy supply using nexus approach for attaining sustainable development goal 7,” in Affordable and Clean Energy: Springer, 2021, pp. 562-573, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95864-4_84.

M. Tuszkiewicz, E. W. Maruszewska, and O. Grzybek, “An experimental study of the effect of AIS automation and customization on project recommendation decision,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 192, pp. 1629-1638, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.167.

H. N. H. Al-Hashimy, I. Said, and R. Ismail, “Evaluating the Impact of Computerized Accounting Information System on the Economic Performance of Construction Companies in Iraq,” Informatica, vol. 46, no. 7, 2022, https://doi.org/10.31449/inf.v46i7.3920.

J. Mökander, J. Morley, M. Taddeo, and L. Floridi, “Ethics-based auditing of automated decision-making systems: Nature, scope, and limitations,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 27, no. 4, p. 44, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00319-4.

H. G. Brauch, “Peace ecology in the Anthropocene,” Decolonising Conflicts, Security, Peace, Gender, Environment and Development in the Anthropocene, pp. 51-185, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62316-6_2.

R. H. BinSaeed, Z. Yousaf, A. Grigorescu, V. Radu, and A. A. Nassani, “Digital Revolution and Digitization Process to Promote AIS as a Vector of Financial Performance,” Systems, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 339, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11070339.

M. Stanitsas, K. Kirytopoulos, and V. Leopoulos, “Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of construction industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 279, p. 123774, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123774.

A. Olabi et al., “Assessment of the pre-combustion carbon capture contribution into sustainable development goals SDGs using novel indicators,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 153, p. 111710, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111710.

H. M. Al-Hattami, “Impact of AIS success on decision-making effectiveness among SMEs in less developed countries,” Information Technology for Development, pp. 1-21, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2022.2073325.

D. Haluza and D. Jungwirth, “Artificial intelligence and ten societal megatrends: An exploratory study using GPT-3,” Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 120, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11030120.

A. Raihan, “The influences of economic progress, natural resources, and capitalization on financial development in the United States,” Innovation and Green Development, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 100146, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igd.2024.100146.

R. Machová, R. Ambrus, T. Zsigmond, and F. Bakó, “The impact of green marketing on consumer behavior in the market of palm oil products,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1364, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031364.

R. Cui and J. Wang, “Shaping sustainable development: External environmental pressure, exploratory green learning, and radical green innovation,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 481-495, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2213.

M. Sharma, S. Luthra, S. Joshi, and A. Kumar, “Analysing the impact of sustainable human resource management practices and industry 4.0 technologies adoption on employability skills,” International Journal of Manpower, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 463-485, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2021-0085.

L. Xu and J. Tan, “Financial development, industrial structure and natural resource utilization efficiency in China,” Resources Policy, vol. 66, p. 101642, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101642.

M. Zhu, W. Zhou, M. Hu, J. Du, and T. Yuan, “Evaluating the renewal degree for expressway regeneration projects based on a model integrating the fuzzy Delphi method, the fuzzy AHP method, and the TOPSIS method,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 3769, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043769.

E. Hayes-Larson, K. L. Kezios, S. J. Mooney, and G. Lovasi, “Who is in this study, anyway? Guidelines for a useful Table 1,” Journal of clinical epidemiology, vol. 114, pp. 125-132, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.011.

J.-H. Cheah, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, T. Ramayah, and H. Ting, “Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses,” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 3192-3210, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2017-0649.

T. Raykov, G. A. Marcoulides, D. M. Dimitrov, and T. Li, “Examining construct congruence for psychometric tests: A note on an extension to binary items and nesting effects,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 167-174, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416655379.

A. Sivakrishna, A. Adesina, P. Awoyera, and K. R. Kumar, “Green concrete: A review of recent developments,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 27, pp. 54-58, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.202.

M. Torlo, I. Kreso, and Š. Edin, “Renewable Energy Sources in Construction of Energy Efficient Residential Buildings,” in New Technologies, Development and Application III 6, 2020: Springer, pp. 709-719, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_81.

S. Pradhan, S. G. Al-Ghamdi, and H. R. Mackey, “Greywater recycling in buildings using living walls and green roofs: A review of the applicability and challenges,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 652, pp. 330-344, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.226.

S. S. Beevi and B. P. Kumar, “Sustainable Solutions for Better Public Road Transportation,” Shanlax International Journal of Economics, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 37-42, 2020, https://doi.org/10.34293/economics.v8i4.3315.

C. Efthymiou et al., “Indoor Environmental Quality Evaluation Strategy as an Upgrade (Renovation) Measure in a Historic Building Located in the Mediterranean Zone (Athens, Greece),” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 21, p. 10133, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110133.

M. El Khatib, K. Alabdooli, A. AlKaabi, and S. Al Harmoodi, “Sustainable Project Management: Trends and Alignment,” Theoretical Economics Letters, vol. 10, no. 06, p. 1276, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2020.106078.

T. O. Olawumi and D. W. Chan, “Critical success factors for implementing building information modeling and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey,” Sustainable Development, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 587-602, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1925.

M. Hu and M. J. Skibniewski, “A review of building construction cost research: Current status, gaps and green buildings,” Green Building & Construction Economics, pp. 1-17, 2021, https://doi.org/10.37256/gbce.212021768.

L. Diago, E. Lacasa, L. Urmente, I. Millán, and J. Santolaya, “Integrating Sustainability in Product Development Projects,” in Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Mechanics, Design Engineering & Advanced Manufacturing (JCM 2018), 2019: Springer, pp. 13-22, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12346-8_2.

J. G. Backes and M. Traverso, “Application of life cycle sustainability assessment in the construction sector: A systematic literature review,” Processes, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 1248, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9071248.

R. Maqbool, X. Deng, and Y. Rashid, “Stakeholders’ satisfaction as a key determinant of critical success factors in renewable energy projects,” Energy, Sustainability and Society, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-15, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00259-0.

M. B. Shaukat, K. F. Latif, A. Sajjad, and G. Eweje, “Revisiting the relationship between sustainable project management and project success: The moderating role of stakeholder engagement and team building,” Sustainable Development, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 58-75, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2228.

M. Waris, Z. S. Azlan, P. F. M. Tamyez, M. Ullah, and A. Khan, “Analyzing the constructs of stakeholder engagement towards renewable energy projects success in Malaysia: A PLS approach,” KnE Social Sciences, pp. 818–843-818–843, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i22.5090.

G. Castelblanco, J. Guevara, D. Rojas, J. Correa, and K. Verhoest, “Environmental Impact Assessment Effectiveness in Public–Private Partnerships: Study on the Colombian Toll Road Program,” Journal of Management in Engineering, vol. 39, no. 2, p. 05023002, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5015.

H. O. Onubi and A. S. Hassan, “How environmental performance influence client satisfaction on projects that adopt green construction practices: The role of economic performance and client types,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 272, p. 122763, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122763.

R. M. Matakanye, H. M. van der Poll, and B. Muchara, “Do companies in different industries respond differently to stakeholders’ pressures when prioritising environmental, social and governance sustainability performance?,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 12022, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112022.

Q. Wang, H. Li, Y. Li, and J. Liu, “How Do Perceived Regulations Influence Environmentally Sustainable Project Management? The Mediating Role of Commitment and Moderating Role of Triple Constraint,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 955, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13040955.

N. Semenova, “The public effect of private sustainability reporting: Evidence from incident-based engagement strategy,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 182, no. 2, pp. 559-572, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05007-8.

N. Srinivasan and S. Dhivya, “An empirical study on stakeholder management in construction projects,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 21, pp. 60-62, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.361.

E. D. Omopariola, A. Windapo, D. J. Edwards, and H. El-Gohary, “Level of financial performance of selected construction companies in South Africa,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 14, no. 11, p. 518, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14110518.

M. Chipulu et al., “A dimensional analysis of stakeholder assessment of project outcomes,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 30, no. 13, pp. 1072-1090, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1567859.

N. Van Du, L. D. Thuc, and H.-B. Tran, “Assessing stakeholder satisfaction in PPP transport projects in developing countries: Evidence from Vietnam,” Built Environment Project and Asset Management, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 309-324, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-08-2021-0106.

E. Princes and A. Said, “The impacts of project complexity, trust in leader, performance readiness and situational leadership on financial sustainability,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 619-644, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-03-2021-0082.

G. Silvius and R. Schipper, “Exploring the relationship between sustainability and project success-conceptual model and expected relationships,” International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 5-22, 2016.

E. Johnson, I. Hemmatian, L. Lanahan, and A. M. Joshi, “A framework and databases for measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems,” Research Policy, vol. 51, no. 2, p. 104398, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104398.

J. F. Hair Jr et al., “Evaluation of formative measurement models,” Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook, pp. 91-113, 2021.

N. H. Mohd Dzin and Y. F. Lay, “Assessing the Validity and Reliability of Science Multiple Choice Test Using Rasch Dichotomous Measurement Model,” Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 927-941, 2021.

N. Kock, “Stable P value calculation methods in PLS-SEM,” Laredo, TX: ScriptWarp Systems, pp. 1-15, 2014.

R. Deloria, A. J. Kivisto, A. Swier-Vosnos, and L. Elwood, “Optimal per test cutoff scores and combinations of failure on multiple embedded performance validity tests in detecting performance invalidity in a mixed clinical sample,” Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, pp. 1-11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1973005.

J. K. Witt, “Insights into criteria for statistical significance from signal detection analysis,” Meta-Psychology, vol. 3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2018.871.

L. S. Lambert and D. A. Newman, “Construct development and validation in three practical steps: Recommendations for reviewers, editors, and authors,” Organizational Research Methods, p. 10944281221115374, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221115374.

E. M. Kamal, E. C. Lou, and A. M. Kamaruddeen, “Effects of innovation capability on radical and incremental innovations and business performance relationships,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 67, p. 101726, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2022.101726.

M. A. Kraft, “Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions,” Educational Researcher, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 241-253, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798.

X.-M. Loh, V.-H. Lee, G. W.-H. Tan, K.-B. Ooi, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Switching from cash to mobile payment: what’s the hold-up?,” Internet Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 376-399, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-04-2020-0175.