Effect of Different Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of IPS Empress Ceramic Materials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51173/jt.v5i3.1074Keywords:
Pressable Ceramic, Surface Roughness, Profilometer, GlazingAbstract
For evaluation and comparison of the effect of surface treatment (glazings, polishing with rubber wheel and diamond paste, and polishing with rubber wheel) on pressable porcelain (IPS Emax porcelain) surface roughness in comparison with non-treated surface. Forty-disc shaped specimens of baseplate wax with 10 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness have been prepared. They were invested and subjected to lost wax technique in fabricate the pressable ceramic. Following pressing, they have been divided randomly into four groups: Group A: no surface treatments, Group B: glazing (paste, HT, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Germany) glazing (paste, HT, Ivoclar, Vivadent, Germany), Group C: polishing with burs (DIAPRO TWIST, EVE, GmbH, Germany), and Group D: polishing with burs (DIAPRO TWIST, EVE, GmbH, Germany) and diamond paste (All in one, RENFERT, GmbH, Germany). For each specimen, examination of mean roughness profile (Ra) was performed for total surface roughness description. Specimens were stabilized with the acrylic holder used previously in the initial polishing procedure. A contact stylus profilometer was used to conduct a quantitative measurement of surface roughness in micrometers (µm) for all specimens. The highest (Ra) value was for control group (1.9520), whereas the lowest values were in group D (Polishing by rubber wheel .4670. One-way ANOVA test showed a high significant value at (P <. 000), and LSD test showed a high significant value at (P <. 000) when comparison was established among groups. From the results of the current study, we can conclude the following; polishing procedure for the surface of pressable ceramic with or without diamond paste produced better surface smoothness than glazed surface and non-treated surface and polishing with burs could be an alternative to glazing to provide smooth surface.
Downloads
References
Wang CNL, Wang YJ, Liu Y, Zhou W, Shen LJ, Fang ML and Zhang X. Bonding of resin cement to zirconia with high pressure primer coating. PloS one 2014 2014 Jul 3;9(7):e101174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101174. eCollection 2014.
Dogheim AY, El kady AS, Ghoneim MM, Abdelmotie MA. In vitro comparative study of LAVA ultimate CAD/CAM restorative system in comparison to IPS E max press. Alexandria Dental Journal. . 2016 Vol.41 Pages:156-162. DOI: 10.21608/ADJALEXU.2016.59271.
Giordano R, Mclaren EA. Ceramics Overview: Classification by Microstructure and Processing Methods, RD Online Dental Education 2010, pg. 1-16. http://thinkblue.me/Pubs/PDFs/Ceramics_Overview_Micro_Proc_Methods.pdf.
Porpjan L, Savencu C, Porojan S. Applications of Heat-pressed Ceramics for Single Tooth Restorations. 2016 Revista de Chimie, Volume: 67, Year: 2016, Issue: 1. https://revistadechimie.ro/Articles.asp?ID=4825.
Al-Shammery, HA, Bubb, NL., Youngson, CC, Fasbinder DJ, Wood DJ. The use of confocal microscopy to assess surface roughness of two milled CAD-CAM ceramics following two polishing techniques. Dent. Mater. 2007, 23, 736–741. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.012
Vasiliu RD, Porojan SD, Bîrdeanu MI, Dragos I, Porojan L. The Effect of Thermocycling and Surface Treatments on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Three Heat-Pressed Ceramics Systems. Crystals 2020, 10, 160. doi:10.3390/cryst10030160.
Hashim A and Mansoor NS. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Surface Roughness and Vickers Micro-Hardness of Feldspathic Porcelain: An In Vitro Study. Mustan Dent J 2021, 17(1): 36-49. https://www.iaor.net/images/Journal/Latest/Afrah_Radhy_Hashim.pdf
Piva AM, Bottino MA, Anami LC, Werner A, Kleverlaan CJ, Lo Giudice R, et al. Toothbrushing wear resistance of stained CAD/CAM ceramics. Coatings. 2021;11(2):224. https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/11/2/224/htm.
Ibraheem AF and Dawood RM. Evaluation of shear bond strength of zirconia to tooth structure after different zirconia surface treatment techniques. Journal of Baghdad College of Dentistry. 2015, 27, 77-85. https://jbcd.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/jbcd/article/view/638.
Hussain A M & AL-azzawi AK J. Shear bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramic and different luting cements. Journal of Gene and Environmental Resources Conservation,. 2015, 3: 212-217.
Tang ZY, Zhao Y, Hara AT. Surface characterization of monolithic zirconia following treatment with different polishing techniques. Materials science forum. Trans Tech Publ. 2020; 176-186. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.980.176.
Incesu E & Yanikoglu N. 2020. Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 124, 100-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.003.
Flury S, Peutzfeldt A, Lussi A. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials. Operative dentistry. 2012; 37, 617-624. DOI: 10.2341/11-391-L.
Luangruangrong P, Cook NB, Sabrah AH, Hara AT, Bottino MC. Influence of full-contour zirconia surface roughness on wear of glass-ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2014; 23, 198-205. DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12088.
Saiki O, Koizumi H, Akazawa N, Kodaira A, Okamura K, Matsumura H. Wear characteristics of polished and glazed lithium disilicate ceramics opposed to three ceramic materials. Journal of Oral Science. 2016 Vol. 58, No. 1, 117-123. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.58.117.
Sarikaya L and Guler AU. Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(1):10-6. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000100004.
Mohammed B, Afram B, Nazar Z. An Evaluation of the Effect of Different Surface Treatment on Hardness and Smoothness of Pressable Ceramic (In Vitro Study). IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS).Volume 14, Issue 2 Ver. IV (Feb. 2015), PP 84-89.
El-Etreby AS. Effect of pressing and glazing on color production, translucency and surface roughness of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. Egyptian Dent J. 2017; Vol. 63, 823:832 DOI: 10.21608/EDJ.2017.75032.
Çakmak G, Gülce M, Subas I, Sert M, Yilmaz B. Effect of surface treatments on wear and surface properties of different CAD-CAM materials and their enamel antagonists. J Prosthet Dent 2021 Jul 20;S0022-3913(21)00340-1 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.023.
Chang S. Lee SH.Yang J.H. Han J.S. Lee J.B. The effect of surface finishes on flexural strength, fracture toughness of feldspathic dental porcelain. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2005; Volume 43, Number 3, 43 (3) :293 – 304. https://kmbase.medric.or.kr/Fulltext/03624/2005-43-3/293-305.pdf.
Ravella H. Krishnan V. Evaluating the effect of reglazing on dental porcelain surfaces - An in vitro study. Indian J Dentistry.2014; 5 (1) : 12 – 16. http://doi.org.10.1016/j.ijd.2013.07.016
Aldosari L, Alshadidi AA Porwal A, Al Ahmari NM. Surface roughness and color measurementsof glazed or polished hybrid, feldspathic and Zirconia CAD/CAM restorative materials after hot and cold coffee immersion. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01770-2. https://www.iaor.net/images/Journal/Latest/Afrah_Radhy_Hashim.pdf
Azeez SM and Salih SA. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of topography for CAD/CAM all ceramic zirconia after different surface treatments EDJ Vol.2 No.1 Jun 2019.
Hashim A and Mansoor NS. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Surface Roughness and Vickers Micro-Hardness of Feldspathic Porcelain: An In Vitro Study. Mustan Dent J 2021, 17(1): 36-49.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sara Abdulbasit Turki , Marwah Hussein Abdulsattar , Zahraa Nazar Alwahab
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
